Legal Opinion
Brondum v. Cox
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided March 7, 1977No. 72PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Justice.
The plaintiff instituted her action for divorce in the Family Court of Hawaii on 24 September 1973. She alleged in her complaint: “Either or each party has been domiciled or has been physically present in this State for a continuous period of at least one year and the Plaintiff has been domiciled or has been physically present in this Circuit for a continuous period of at least three months next preceding this application for divorce.” The summons and complaint in that action were served upon the defendant in North Carolina by registered mail. The defendant so concedes. Thus, he…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Bruton v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Neill v. RidnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Garcia v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fancher v. FancherOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Trisha Louise Conlon, by Next Friend Judy Conlon v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Lightell v. LightellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Lynch v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Wake County Ex Rel. Carrington v. TownesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.