Legal Opinion · Dissent

Illinois State Toll Highway Authority v. American National Bank & Trust Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1994No. 74738, 74798 and 76434Published

1DissentJustice Nickels

I do not agree that the trial court erred in granting the landowners’ motion in limine to exclude evidence of special benefits to the property not taken. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

In the instant case, the condemning authority took a portion of landowners’ property in order to construct wetlands to compensate for other wetlands destroyed by the highway project and for a utility easement. The measure of damages to property not taken is the difference in the fair market value of the property as a whole before and after the improvement and, in making this computation, special benefits…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kane v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Department of Public Works & Buildings v. DivitIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Ayer v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Department of Public Works & Buildings v. GriffinIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Capitol Building Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API