Legal Opinion
Jim Maxwell v. County of San Diego
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 14, 2013No. 10-56671, 10-56706PublishedCited by 112 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge FARRIS; Dissent by Judge IKUTA.
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing in case number 10-56671; Judges Clifton and Ikuta vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Farris so recommends.
Judges Farris and Clifton vote to deny the petition for rehearing in case number 10-56706; Judge Clifton votes to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Farris so recommends. Judge Ikuta votes to grant the petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc and no…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- Rahne Pistor v. Carlos GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Alejandro Velazquez v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Erin Lincoln v. City of Colleyville, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Juan Hernandez v. City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Albert Alto v. Kenneth SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.