Legal Opinion · Dissent

American Economy Insurance v. Canamore

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 22, 1992No. 90 1 278; CA A68372Published

1DissentWarren, P. J.

The majority concludes that multi-risk, excess liability insurance (umbrella) policies are subject to the requirements of the compulsory uninsured motorist statutes. ORS 742.500 to ORS 742.506. Because the majority erroneously employs the rules of statutory construction to reach a result that the legislature did not intend, I dissent.

The majority states that it “is not appropriate to consider extrinsic evidence of legislative intent when the language of the statute has a plain, natural and ordinary meaning.” 114 Or App at 351.1 agree with that statement, as far as it goes. However, it does…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. TippieOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API