Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Hubbard v. Township Board

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1872PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Application for mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

By act No. 414 of 1871, the governor was empowered to appoint three commissioners to improve Fort street from the western limits of the city of Detroit to the Dearborn road — the entire work being in the township of Springwells. The commissioners were not required to reside in the town, and, in fact, a majority did not. The work to be done included macadamizing and draining the street, with some other necessary finishing, and when done it was to be paid for by issuing bonds of the township, the interest of which was to be met by a general tax on the township, and the principal by an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Le Roy v. HurlbutMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Williams v. SpurrMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney General v. DonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Loomis v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Allor v. Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. State ex rel. Attorney General v. MooresNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. State ex rel. Howe v. Mayor of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API