Michele Dessi v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HASTIE, Circuit Judge.
In this Federal Employers’ Liability Act 1 case the appellant Dessi, plaintiff below, asks us to reverse a judgment entered for the defendant, notwithstanding a jury verdict for the plaintiff on his personal injury claim. The district court reasoned that the evidence offered no rational basis for a conclusion that the plaintiff’s injury, in the language of the statute, “result[ed] in whole or in part” from the railroad’s negligence. We must now decide whether there was a jury question on the issue of causation.
Plaintiff, a sixty-three year old mechanic, was rendered…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Francesco Sano v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Peter J. Zegan v. Central Railroad Company of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Ridings v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
- Emilio Albergo v. Reading CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Dunn v. Conemaugh & Black Lick RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.