Legal Opinion

Michele Dessi v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 13, 1958No. 12261_1PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

In this Federal Employers’ Liability Act 1 case the appellant Dessi, plaintiff below, asks us to reverse a judgment entered for the defendant, notwithstanding a jury verdict for the plaintiff on his personal injury claim. The district court reasoned that the evidence offered no rational basis for a conclusion that the plaintiff’s injury, in the language of the statute, “result[ed] in whole or in part” from the railroad’s negligence. We must now decide whether there was a jury question on the issue of causation.

Plaintiff, a sixty-three year old mechanic, was rendered…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Francesco Sano v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  2. Peter J. Zegan v. Central Railroad Company of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  3. Ridings v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  4. Emilio Albergo v. Reading CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  5. Dunn v. Conemaugh & Black Lick RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API