Legal Opinion

Morrill v. Hoyt

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1892No. 3151PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from Dallas. Tried below before Hon. George H. Aldredge. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

TABLTOH, Judge,

Section B.—February 2, 1885, one J. H. Davis executed a note for the sum of $1300, payable to the order of plaintiff in error, secured by a deed in trust on certain real estate, and due two years after date, with interest from date until paid at the rate of 12 per cent per annum. The interest was payable annually, and the note stipulated, that “upon default in the payment of the interest for any year the principal of this note is at once to become due and payable.” The note further provided for “10 per cent additional as attorney fees if legal proceedings be instituted on this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harrison Machine Works v. ReigorTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Cotton v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Simmons v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Smith v. Mortgage & Debenture Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1900
  2. Beckham v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Citizens Nat. Bank of Orange, Va. v. WaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  4. Hume v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. San Antonio Real Estate, Building & Loan Ass'n v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API