Legal Opinion
In the Matter of the Disbarment of Paul E. Rhodes
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 6, 1967No. 18371_1PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOL, District Judge.
This is an appeal from the District Court for the District of Nebraska. The appellant, Paul E. Rhodes, was disbarred from practicing law in that court and seeks reversal of the judgment of disbarment.
Rhodes was admitted to practice in the State of Nebraska on June 23, 1943. Without discussing the substantial amount of litigation which has preceded this action, 1 the ultimate facts as shown by the record are as follows: Rhodes has been a member of the Bar of the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska since July 27, 1943. In 1964, a judgment of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Railway Employes' Department v. HansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lathrop v. DonohueSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Rhodes v. HoustonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1962
- Paul Rhodes v. Clarence A. H. Meyer, Paul Rhodes v. Richard M. Van SteenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Dacey v. Connecticut Bar Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Norman F. Dacey v. Peter C. DorseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Mildner v. GulottaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1976
- MacKay v. NesbettDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1968
- Paul E. Rhodes v. Norval Houston, Paul E. Rhodes v. Clarence A. H. Meyer, Paul E. Rhodes v. Richard M. Van SteenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.