Legal Opinion

Quake v. Lo

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 10, 2019No. 2018-1779, 2018-1780, 2018-1782PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chen, Circuit Judge.

*1367 This appeal arises from a decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) finding the four claims of Dr. Stephen Quake and Dr. Christina Fan's (collectively, Quake) U.S. Patent No. 8,008,018 and Claim 25 of their U.S. Patent Application No. 12/393,833 unpatentable for lack of written description under 35 U.S.C. § 112 as part of three interference proceedings.

The claims cover a method of determining the presence of a chromosomal abnormality (called aneuploidy ) in fetuses by using massively parallel sequencing (MPS) technology to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. The Regents of the University of California v. Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  3. Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumuller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred BanderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  4. Carnegie Mellon University v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. Abbvie Deutschland GmbH & Co., KG v. Janssen Biotech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Genentech, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
  2. IBM v. Zillow Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025
  3. Shure Incorporated v. ClearOne, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API