Legal Opinion
Carnegie Mellon University v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 8, 2008No. 2007-1266, 2007-1267PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Carnegie Mellon University (“CMU”) and Three Rivers Biologicals, Inc. (collectively “appellants”) appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California holding that Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Roche Biomedical Laboratories, Inc., The Perkin Elmer Corporation, and Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (collectively “Roche”) do not infringe the patents in suit and that certain claims are invalid for lack of written description. Because we conclude that the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Vas-Cath Incorporated and Gambro, Inc. v. Sakharam D. Mahurkar, and Quinton Instruments CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- McRO, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games America Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Wavetronix v. EIS Electronic Integrated SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Boston Scientific Corp. v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.