Legal Opinion

Blasing v. Zurich American Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 3, 2013No. 2012AP858PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundsten, P.J.

¶ 1. Vicki Biasing was injured by an employee of Menard, Inc. while the employee was loading Biasing's truck with lumber. Biasing has automobile insurance through American Family Mutual Insurance Company. The question here is whether American Family must defend Menards and provide coverage if it is determined that the Menards employee negligently injured Biasing.

¶ 2. Menards argues that its employee is covered as a permissive vehicle user under Biasing's American Family automobile policy. The general rule is that permissive vehicle users are additional insureds under automobile policies and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Lawver v. BolingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Lukaszewicz v. Concrete Research, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Truck Insurance ExchangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vicki L. Blasing v. Zurich American Ins. Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Great West Casualty Co. v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. Menard, Inc. v. Country Preferred Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  4. Auto Club Insurance Association v. Menard, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  5. Great West Casualty Company v. Pamela RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API