Legal Opinion
Cole v. Cenlar Federal Savings Bank (In Re Cole)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 6, 1996No. 19-11519PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Chief Judge.
A INTRODUCTION
The instant adversary proceeding (“the Proceeding”) requires this court to determine whether the debtor and plaintiff, BRENDA A. COLE (“the Debtor”), is entitled to a discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 1328(a) and, if so, what the amount of her post-discharge obligation will be to her residential mortgagee, defendant CENLAR FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK (“Cenlar”). In addition to factual issues regarding the distribution of the Debtor’s plan payments by defendant EDWARD SPARKMAN, the standing Chapter 13 trustee (“the Trustee”), towards, principally, mortgage…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re Fred J. Szostek, Denise M. SzostekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Frank and Arlene Wilson v. Commonwealth Mortgage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- In Re HammondCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Taylor v. First Union Mortgage Co. (In Re Taylor)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997