Bacharach Industrial Instrument Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Sullivan, Judge:
The appraiser’s reports in these three protests having been filed within the legal time, are part of the record. They are identical, and read as follows:
Merchandise under protest consists of so-called “Ardometers” which employ the pyrometric method in operation and was advisorily classified at 60% — 228-A following T. D. 48085.
The tariff act involved is that of 1930.
In protest 936964-G the red-ink notation on the invoice shows that the classification of this merchandise was as “parts for optical measuring instruments.” In protest 951222-G the red-ink notation on the invoice…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Engis Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Parsons Optical Laboratories Harper, Robinson & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Horizon Lines, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009