Legal Opinion

Bacharach Industrial Instrument Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 17, 1939No. C. D. 149PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sullivan, Judge:

The appraiser’s reports in these three protests having been filed within the legal time, are part of the record. They are identical, and read as follows:

Merchandise under protest consists of so-called “Ardometers” which employ the pyrometric method in operation and was advisorily classified at 60% — 228-A following T. D. 48085.

The tariff act involved is that of 1930.

In protest 936964-G the red-ink notation on the invoice shows that the classification of this merchandise was as “parts for optical measuring instruments.” In protest 951222-G the red-ink notation on the invoice…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Engis Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Parsons Optical Laboratories Harper, Robinson & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. Horizon Lines, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API