Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Bailey

(after stating the facts as above).

Tbe appellant’s propositions in effect present tbe points in view: (1) That tbe insured was not reinstated as a matter of right under bis lapsed, certificate, because at tbe time be was sick with a disease from which he subsequently died; and (2) tbe order did not waive compliance with tbe requirement of good health of tbe insured, and is not estopped from insisting that tbe insured was not a member in good standing at tbe time of bis death.

It is believed that tbe appellant’s contention should be sustained. Tbe laws of tbe order, quoted above, together with…