Legal Opinion

Young v. Aetna Life Ins.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 14, 1940No. 20264PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, District Judge.

This case was tried before the court and a jury which returned a verdict for the plaintiff.

Suit was on two policies issued by the defendant on the life of the plaintiff’s deceased husband. The policies contained a provision for double indemnity in the event of accidental death by bodily injury. The provision read as follows:

“If the death of the insured occurs while this policy is in force and such death results directly and independently of all other causes from bodily injuries effected solely through external, violent and accidental means within ninety days from the.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Timetrust, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1939
  5. Neely v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blank v. BitkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  2. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United States v. SaftlasDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Contois v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1945
  4. Snodgrass v. Roberts Dairy Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API