Legal Opinion

State v. Ternes

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1977No. Cr. 595PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

Philip J. Ternes was charged with the murder of his wife and was convicted of manslaughter. He appeals, contending that the trial court- abused its discretion in refusing to remove a part-time police officer from the jury upon challenge for cause, and further contending that the “dangerous special offender act” was improperly applied in his sentencing. We affirm the conviction.

It is settled law in North Dakota that no error can be predicated in the overruling of a challenge for cause where the appellant has not exhausted all of his peremptory challenges. State v. Uhler, 32…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Berra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. People v. CulhaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. In RE OLSEN v. DelmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State of Oregon v. PirkeyOregon Supreme Court · 1955

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Busby v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. State v. BeckettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. JensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API