Honstein v. Metro West Ambulance Service, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
Plaintiff, a paramedic, alleged that defendant, his employer, unlawfully fired him because of his disability and because he filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits. The jury returned a verdict for the defense. On appeal, plaintiff assigns error to the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury that, in order to prevail, defendant had to prove that accommodating plaintiff would impose an undue hardship. He also assigns error to the court’s decision to admit certain evidence that plaintiff argued was irrelevant and prejudicial. Unpersuaded by any of plaintiffs arguments, we affirm.
In…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- US Airways, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. TitusOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fenimore v. Blachly-Lane Cnty. C.E.A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Moorehead v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015