Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Ellenbogen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 24, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of December 17, 1938, granting plaintiff’s motion to strike out the second and third separate defenses, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Section 353-a of the General Business *1104Law contemplates that as to property derived by a defendant by means of fraudulent practices, and reduced to possession of a receiver, the claimants thereto shall be entitled to proportionate distribution. The scope of the receivership, however, is limited to such property, as distinguished from general assets. (Goldberg v. Weihman, 243 App.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goldberg v. WeihmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bradford Audio Corporation v. Edward Pious, Individually and as Purported Receiver of Bradford Audio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  2. Elfast v. LambCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  3. Eisenberg v. HicksNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  4. In re ElfastDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API