Legal Opinion
In re Elfast
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 29, 1939No. 74235PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MANDELBAUM, District Judge.
The alleged bankrupt and his co-partners, on the application of the Attorney General of the State of New York, were enjoined in the state court from selling securities and a receiver commonly known as a Martin Act receiver was appointed, pursuant to Section 353-a of the General Business Law.of the State of New York, Consol. Laws N.Y.C. 20.
A creditor of the alleged bankrupt filed an involuntary petition .in bankruptcy against the alleged bankrupt claiming that the appointment of this Martin Act receiver constituted an act of bankruptcy, pursuant to Section 3, sub.'…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Duparquet Huot & Moneuse Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. ET Sheftall & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- American Woolen Co. v. American Silk Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Burns v. MaguireNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Burns v. MaguireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re RoyDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1942