Sanatorium v. . State Treasurer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
CONTROVERSY submitted on ease agreed and beard before Devin, J., at April Term, 1917, of Wake. Tbe question at issue was whether tbe sum of $10,000, “annually,” appropriated by tbe General Assembly of 1915 (chapter 98) for “extension work” by tbe “Bureau of Tuberculosis,” a special bureau of plaintiff corporation created by chapter 40, Extra Session 1913, should be set apart and made available by defendant for tbe purpose indicated.
Read the full summary
CONTROVERSY submitted on ease agreed and beard before Devin, J., at April Term, 1917, of Wake. Tbe question at issue was whether tbe sum of $10,000, “annually,” appropriated by tbe General Assembly of 1915 (chapter 98) for “extension work” by tbe “Bureau of Tuberculosis,” a special bureau of plaintiff corporation created by chapter 40, Extra Session 1913, should be set apart and made available by defendant for tbe purpose indicated. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant excepted and appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtIIoke, J.
By Chapter 964, Laws 1907, the General Assembly incorporated plaintiff corporation for treatment of “persons afflicted with tuberculosis,” appointed a directorate and made appropriation of $15,000 for' establishment, ánd $5,000 for maintenance, and thereafter, at its biennial sessions, made appropriations for this institution for the two designated purposes of improvement and repairs and current main*812tenance, till the special session of 1913. At that session, by chapter 42, the Legislature abolished or removed the old directorate and substituted therefor the members of the State Hoard of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. Perkins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Winslow v. . MortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- State Ex Rel. Solicitor v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- State v. Davis.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Agricultural & Mechanical College v. LacySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902