Legal Opinion

Dula v. Parsons

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1955No. 311PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

The brief of appellant indicates that he challenges the judgment from which this appeal is taken on the ground that the exceptions appearing in the two deeds of trust, and in the deed from defendant, judgment debtor, as set forth in statement of facts herein-above, gave to plaintiff sufficient recorded notice of the fact that defendant no longer owned any interest whatever in the 13% acres of land here in controversy. The contention is not well taken.

A docketed judgment, directing the payment of money, is a lien on the real property situated in the county in which the judgment is docketed and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McClure v. . CrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. City of Durham v. PollardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Simmons v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. BurtonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1984
  2. Williams v. Town of GriftonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Hart v. HassellDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1966
  4. Goldsboro Milling Co. v. ReavesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API