Globe Indemnity Co. v. Brooks
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is well settled that an award in a workmen’s-compensation proceeding must be supported by findings of fact; that findings of fact must be based on evidence, and that mere conjecture does not constitute evidence upon which such findings may be based. Lathem v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 60 Ga. App. 523 (3 S. E. 2d, 916); U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Brown, 68 Ga. App. 706 (23 S. E. 2d, 443); Woodruff v. American Mutual Liability Ins. Co., 67 Ga. App. 554 (21 S. E. 2d, 298). It is also indisputable that a disability resulting from loss or loss…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Woodruff v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Lathem v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Travelers Insurance v. ReidSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Young Men's Christian Assn. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Bankers Health & Life Insurance v. FryhoferCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Singleton v. Young Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- Callaway Mills Co. v. HurleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of America v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.