Legal Opinion

Globe Indemnity Co. v. Brooks

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 4, 1951No. 33699PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is well settled that an award in a workmen’s-compensation proceeding must be supported by findings of fact; that findings of fact must be based on evidence, and that mere conjecture does not constitute evidence upon which such findings may be based. Lathem v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 60 Ga. App. 523 (3 S. E. 2d, 916); U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Brown, 68 Ga. App. 706 (23 S. E. 2d, 443); Woodruff v. American Mutual Liability Ins. Co., 67 Ga. App. 554 (21 S. E. 2d, 298). It is also indisputable that a disability resulting from loss or loss…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  2. Lathem v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  4. Travelers Insurance v. ReidSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Young Men's Christian Assn. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Bankers Health & Life Insurance v. FryhoferCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Singleton v. Young Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  4. Callaway Mills Co. v. HurleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  5. Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of America v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API