State v. Simpson

CROCKETT, Justice.

Defendant appeals from a conviction of second degree burglary. His contentions for reversal are:(1) That there was not sufficient corroboration of the testimony of his accomplice, Paul Perkins.(2) That the court erroneously admitted in evidence a conversation between another accomplice, James Nixon, and one Henry Oliver, a witness for the State, and(8) Refusal to instruct the jury that the testimony of an accomplice should be viewed with caution.

The defendant does not prevail on any of the foregoing assertions and the conviction is affirmed.

The story as told by the…