Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gill v. Conlin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 21, 1983No. 82-559Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE JONES,

specially concurring:

Aside from the procedural aspects of this case discussed by the majority, there is another, and I believe more substantive, basis for the result reached. That other basis is the fact that the Conlins were alleged by the Gills to have had actual notice of the claim of the Gills to the 50 acres of real estate involved by virtue of their contract for deed. If the Conlins did have actual, or even constructive, notice of the claim of the Gills at the time they registered their Indiana judgment against Utley and obtained an execution sale, the claim of the Gills…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burnex Oil Co. v. FloydAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  2. Thorpe v. HelmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Carnes v. WhitfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hayes v. CareyIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Bauman v. SchoaffAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API