Legal Opinion

Stacy B. v. Robert S.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 10, 2016No. AC38043PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.

The defendant, Robert S., appeals from the granting of a civil protective order barring the defendant from stalking the plaintiff, Stacy B. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court erred in (1) failing to determine that his conduct qualified as constitutionally protected under the first amendment to the United States constitution and article first, §§ 4 and 5, of the Connecticut constitution; 1 and (2) finding that the conduct constituted stalking when the evidence was insufficient. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The plaintiff filed an application for a protective order…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Brunetti v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. State v. BrunettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. State v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Guiliano v. Jefferson Radiology, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  2. S. S. v. D. M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2024
  3. Ellen S. v. Katlyn F.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  4. Maurice v. Chester Housing Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  5. Fiona C. v. Kevin L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API