Pelagia Kitmirides v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
*730 Opinion
PETERS, J.
The issue in this case of first impression in Connecticut is the coverage afforded by an insurance policy that lists a person as a driver of a covered vehicle on the declarations page, but does not list that person as a named insured. The trial court found that the description of the named insured was unambiguous and determinative of the rights of the parties. Accordingly, the court ruled in favor of the insurer. The validity of that determination is the sole issue in this appeal. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiff Pelagia Kitmirides,1 a pedestrian, was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harvey v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Progressive Casualty Insurance v. Robert Mathew Hurley & Devil Eleven, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Mallane v. Holyoke Mutual Insurance Co. in SalemSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
- Lehrhoff v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- HLO Land Ownership Associates Ltd. Partnership v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- True v. RainesKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Connecticut Medical Insurance v. KulikowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Taylor v. MucciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Eldridge v. Columbia Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Garcia v. ITT Hartford InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.