Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Sorsby
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 9, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 13, 1999, which, upon reconsideration, rescinded its prior decisions and ruled that claimant was eligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she had sufficient weeks of covered employment to file a valid original claim.
In October 1995, claimant entered into a lease agreement pursuant to which she agreed to rent an apartment connected to the office of the employer’s seasonal motel and to provide services at the motel in exchange for payment at a specified hourly rate. At the conclusion of the 1996…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re the Claim of BooneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of SorgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of FosterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of AuresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of FoldesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Matter of Mwanika (JM Murray Ctr., Inc.--Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Matter of Leone (Woodmere Florist, Ltd.--Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020