Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Foster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikoll, J. P.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 19, 1998, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Following a hearing on charges of misconduct pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75, claimant’s employment as a school bus driver was terminated. Her application for unemployment in*900sur anee benefits was denied on the ground that she had lost her employment due to misconduct, but the initial determination was overruled by an Administrative Law Judge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RanniNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. In re the Claim of HunttAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re Rongovian Embassy, inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of DimpsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re the Claim of RizzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. In re the Claim of SorsbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Matter of Nottage (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API