Legal Opinion
State v. Beck
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1996No. NonePublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] David Gordon Beck, a prisoner at the Springfield Correctional Facility, alleged that his prosecution for possession of marijuana by an inmate, following the imposition of prison discipline for the same conduct, violated the double jeopardy protections of the state and federal constitutions. The trial court agreed and dismissed the information. State appeals. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
[¶ 2] Beck is a prisoner at the Springfield Correctional Facility, serving time for a conviction of aggravated assault. Based on a tip by a confidential informant, prison and law…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. CatesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. AugustineSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. RolfeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Steinkruger v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BakerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.