Legal Opinion

Reeder v. Twin City Fire Ins.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided December 12, 1933No. 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RITTER, District Judge.

Defendant’s amended first plea alleges the failure on the part of the insured and plaintiff, who is the mortgagee in the premises, to furnish proof of loss within sixty days, as prescribed. The policy provides, under, the heading of requirements in case of loss, as follows:

“The insured shall, within sixty days after the windstorm, Cyclone or tornado, unless such time is extended in writing by this company, render to this company a proof of loss, signed and sworn to by the insured, stating the knowledge and belief of the insured as to the following,” etc.

It is admitted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Syndicate Ins. v. BohnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  2. Germania Fire Insurance v. BallyArizona Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Queen Ins. v. People's Union Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Syracuse Savings Bank v. Yorkshire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Green v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API