Legal Opinion

Cooke v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1939No. Appeal, 44PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Linn,

This appeal is from the refusal of a mandamus to require the Auditor General to approve and the City Treasurer of Philadelphia to pay $6,614.59, claimed by appellant for services as de facto mercantile appraiser from January 5,1938, to March 24, 1938.

The circumstances in which appellant came into the office are stated in Com. ex rel. v. Marinelli et al., 330 Pa. 82, 198 A. 623, Cooke, one of the respondents in that case, being the present appellant. In the brief filed on his behalf, his counsel recognizes that by the accepted rule in this state the emoluments are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Suermann v. Hadley, Treas. (White)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Jones v. DusmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Shoemaker v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kelley v. MarinelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Specter v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Reiter v. ReiterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Zawada v. Pennsylvania System Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Tarner v. Chambersburg Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Gerson v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API