Legal Opinion

State v. J.H.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 21, 1999No. Nos. 41486-1-I; 41488-7-I; 41638-3-I; 41942-1-I; 41774-6-I; 41695-2-I; 41633-2-I; 42055-1-I; 42253-7-I; 41766-5-I; 41875-1-I; 41991-9-IPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.

In this consolidated appeal, we consider whether the 1997 amendments to the juvenile justice code have made juvenile proceedings so similar to adult criminal proceedings that juvenile offenders are now entitled to a jury trial under either the United States or Washington constitution. Applying Washington case precedent, we find that the amendments do not render juvenile proceedings so much less rehabilitative and more punitive that the right to a jury trial must attach. Some of the juveniles raise additional arguments based on the facts of their particular cases. We find no reversible error…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. SchaafWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. Shawn P.Washington Supreme Court · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. ChavezWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. J.A.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. State v. TAI N.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API