Legal Opinion

Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation v. Ring Lardner, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 9, 1954No. 13491_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.

Ring Lardner, Jr., plaintiff and appellee, in the year 1947 was working under written contract as a screen writer for Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation. The latter, defendant and appellant, will hereinafter be referred to as “Fox.”

Lardner was discharged on November 28, 1947, by Fox. Lardner filed suit and obtained judgment for approximately $25,000 in salary accruing after his discharge. This is a diversity case and Fox has appealed.

The events leading up to the discharge of Lardner start in 1947 with an investigation and hearings of the Un-American Activities…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Loew's, Inc. v. ColeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  4. Nagel v. KrausCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  5. Adams v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Independent Productions Corp. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  2. Tseung Chu v. CornellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  3. Vaughn v. American Basketball Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  4. Brock v. Mutual Reports, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. James W. Kippen v. American Automatic Typewriter CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API