Legal Opinion

Berlin v. Evans

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 2011PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Anil C. Singh, J.

This is a CPLR article 78 proceeding. Petitioner challenges respondent New York State Division of Parole’s application to him of Executive Law § 259-c (14), which prohibits individuals who are on parole for certain categories of sex crimes from residing within 1,000 feet of schools where children under the age of 18 are enrolled. Petitioner contends that, as applied to his circumstances, the statute is an unconstitutional ex post facto law because he committed the criminal offense before the effective date of the statute and the statute increases the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. People v. HarnettNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. BakerKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. PollardIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. F.R. v. St. Charles County Sheriff's DepartmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wallace v. StateDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  2. Terrance v. CITY OF GENEVA, NYDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011
  3. Williams v. Department of Corrections & Community SupervisionNew York Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Berlin v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Berlin v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API