Legal Opinion

F.R. v. St. Charles County Sheriff's Department

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 12, 2010No. SC 89834, SC 90164PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL A. WOLFF, Judge.

In the first of these cases, F.R., a convicted sex offender, challenges the constitutional validity of section 566.147 1 Missouri’s “School Residency Law,” which prohibits convicted sex offenders from residing within 1,000 feet of any school or child-care facility. Because F.R. was convicted and sentenced before the “school residency law” was enacted, section 566.147, as applied to F.R., is unconstitutionally retrospective in its operation.

The circuit court entered judgment against F.R. The judgment is reversed.

In the second case, Charles Raynor, a convicted sex…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Doe v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  2. Squaw Creek Drainage District v. TurneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  3. Jerry-Russell Bliss, Inc. v. Hazardous Waste Management CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  4. State Ex Rel. Koster v. OliveSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. Franklin County Ex Rel. Parks v. Franklin County CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  2. Rentschler v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  4. State Ex Inf. Hensley v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  5. Doe v. NixonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API