State v. Castner
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACKSON, Judge:
Defendants Bonnie Lee Castner and William Eluie Castner, II, appeal from several drug related convictions. Defendants argue that the trial court erred in not granting their motion to suppress certain evidence found as a result of a search of their vehicle and personal belongings. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
The following factual statements are taken from undisputed testimony at the suppression hearing. The Castners elected not to testify at that hearing; therefore only the State presented evidence. Since the Castners stipulated that the preliminary hearing transcript could be…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. ThurmanUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. SpurgeonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
- State v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- State v. DelaneyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- State v. BredehoftCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.