Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 10, 1963No. 6 Div. 875PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON, Justice,

This is a suit in equity by appellee, complainant below, against appellant, respondent below, to establish and define a disputed boundary line between adjoining lands. Code 1940, Title 13, § 129(5); Title 47, §§ 2-4.

■ The appeal is from a final decree with error assigned in regard to the court’s decree overruling demurrer.

The demurrer challenged the sufficiency of the amended bill as one to define a disputed boundary line for its asserted failure to point out or designate the true boundary line between complainant’s land and that of respondent.

A bill to settle a disputed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. RoperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Snodgrass v. SnodgrassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BoykinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  4. Green v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  5. Doe ex dem. Hooper v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cousins v. McNeelCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API