Stinson v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Justice SCOTT.
Appellant was indicted for first-degree sexual abuse under KRS 510.110(l)(d) and subsequently entered a conditional Alford guilty plea while reserving his right to appeal the trial court’s judgment. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision and we granted discretionary review. Appellant makes three arguments in support of his appeal: (1) that “lack of consent” is an element of first degree sexual abuse under KRS 510.110(l)(d), (2) that KRS 510.110(l)(d) is unconstitutionally vague, and (3) that KRS 510.110(l)(d) is unconstitutionally…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carol King v. West Virginia's Choice, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- SER Robert E. Barrat, Esq. v. Nancy A. Dalby, Esq.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
- State of West Virginia v. J.E and State of West Virginia v. Z.M.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
- Big Sandy Regional Jail Authority v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
- Big Sandy Regional Jail Authority v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.