Ira Haney v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIAN, Judge.
— The offense is theft of cattle; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.
The indictment alleges that appellant “did then and there unlawfully take one head of cattle,” etc., omitting the word “fraudulently”. The use of the word “fraudulently” is indispensable in charging theft under our statute. Byrd v. State, 89 Texas Crim. Rep., 371, 231 S. W., 399; Prim v. State, 32 Texas, 158; Conner v. State, 6 Texas App., 455; Young v. State, 12 Texas App., 614; Muldrew v. State, 12 Texas App., 617; Sloan v. State, 18 Texas App., 225; Ortis v. State, 18 Texas…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baldwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Byrd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Newman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Watt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Chance v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Patterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Rhodes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932