Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 9, 1932No. 15635PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft of hogs; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment alleges that appellant “did then and there unlawfully take nine hogs,” etc., omitting the word “fraudulently.” The use of the word “fraudulently” is indispensable in charging theft under our statute (Pen. Code, 1925, art. 1410). Haney v. State, 117 Texas Crim. Rep., 564, 37 S. W. (2d) 746; Phillips v. State, 89 Texas Crim. Rep., 483, 231 S. W., 400, 401, and authorities cited. In Phillips v. State, supra, it was held that an allegation that the appellant “did unlawfully…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Ira Haney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Whatley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API