Legal Opinion
Snooks v. Ninth Judicial District Court
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 1996No. 27761PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is an original petition, properly verified, for a writ of prohibition to preclude the Ninth Judicial District Court from proceeding with the underlying litigation filed in state court against petitioner, Wayne Snooks. On December 21, 1995, this court ordered real parties in interest, James J. Bassetto, Tommy E. Joyner and Wendy Joyner, to file an answer to the petition. The real parties in interest filed their answer on January 9, 1996.
FACTS
Snooks is a defendant in the underlying action which is pending in the Ninth Judicial District Court, Bassetto v. Joyner, Case No. 94-CV-0132.…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kennerly v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial District of MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- R.J. Williams Company, Richard J. Williams and Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. Fort Belknap Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Nevada Power Co. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- South Fork Band of Te-Moak Tribe v. Sixth Judicial District Court of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2000