Legal Opinion

Coulbern v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 1995No. 34A02-9504-CR-182PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Tamara Coulbern brings this interlocutory appeal of the trial court's denial of her motion to dismiss the criminal prosecution against her for several counts of drug dealing. Coulbern argues that the jeopardy assessment (and collection) of the Indiana Controlled Substance Excise Tax [CSET] in the amount of $845.53 by the Indiana Department of Revenue prohibit the criminal prosecution for drug dealing under principles of double jeopardy. We agree.

We need not devote extensive analysis to the present case because its ultimate disposition will depend upon the anticipated…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Whitt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Bailey v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1994
  4. Hayse v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1994
  5. Collins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coulbern v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Fassinger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API