Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Jacobs

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1952No. 5449PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DE CONCENT, Justice.

On November 10, 1948, T. S. Henderson, hereinafter referred to as appellant, entered into an option agreement with A. E. Jacobs, hereinafter referred to as appellee, whereby the latter was given an option to purchase appellant’s “plumbing contracting and supply business” for $6,000. One thousand dollars was paid for the option, and $1,000 was to be paid November 24, 1948, and $100 per month thereafter. Appellee did not pay the November 24th payment but took possession of the business, trucks, and inventory. On January 5, 1949 appellee borrowed $1,000 at the bank, with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Continental Oil Co. v. FennemoreArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Melrose v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  3. De Soto v. De JaquezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Employer's Liability Assurance Corporation v. LuntArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Gann v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  3. In the Matter of Wonderfair Stores, Inc. Of Arizona, Debtor. Sam Jonas, Trustee-Appellant v. Walgreen Arizona Drug Co., Walgreen Arizona Drug Co. v. Mary Ann LevittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Lessner Dental Laboratories, Inc. v. KidneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Park Central Development Co. v. Roberts Dry Goods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API