Legal Opinion

Sauve v. Winfree

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1999No. S-8626PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

After falling down a stairway at her place of employment, Nanette Sauve sued the premises owners, Dennis Winfree and Bill Nix, who were also the officers and sole shareholders of Sauve’s corporate employer. The superior court granted summary judgment to Winfree and Nix after concluding that their landlord duties were inextricably intertwined with their corporate duties and, thus, that they were immune as co-employees under the Workers’ Compensation Act. Because Sauve raised a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Winfree and Nix’s negligence as…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Webb v. City and Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Sargent v. RossSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  4. City of Fairbanks v. SchaibleAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Borg-Warner Corp. v. Avco Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kiernan v. CreechAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Kiokun v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Fleegel v. Estate of BoylesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Martin County Coal Corp. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2011
  5. Fleegel v. Estate of BoylesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API