Legal Opinion

Duarte v. Rivers

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1949No. Civ. 3702PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial made under section 953e of the Code of Civil Procedure. The action involved the right to use certain channels and ditches, and the manner of handling certain excess flows of water. There were several groups of parties with conflicting interests. The judgment enjoined the Persian. Ditch Company and certain individuals from taking water from Mill Creek in excess of a given amount, and required them to control the flow of water into their ditch accordingly.

The trial of the action lasted five days and was concluded on February 6,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. Edward Brown & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Fickett v. RauchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Charles E. Hart v. Frank Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison, State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  2. Santa Cruz County Redevelopment Agency v. IzantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Lilienthal v. Hastings Clothing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Aylmer v. AylmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Tomlin v. Reynolds Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API