Legal Opinion
Charles E. Hart v. Frank Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison, State of Arizona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 12, 1972No. 26347PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING HILL, District Judge:
In this opinion, we consider the extent of the obligation of a state to provide to an incarcerated prisoner who has filed a habeas corpus petition in the federal court a reasonable substitute for the transcript of his trial when the court reporter’s notes are lost. And we also consider the propriety of an order of a federal district judge in such a case which gives the state the alternatives of (1) holding the necessary hearings in the state court for the creation of a reasonable substitute for a trial transcript, (2) granting petitioner a delayed appeal in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Norvell v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Case v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Grigsby v. MabryDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1983
- United States v. Bruce Alan CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Prock v. District Court of Pittsburg CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- State v. SchackartArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Grigsby v. MabryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.