Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Barth v. De Coursey

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1949No. 7529Published

1ConcurrenceTaylor, Justice

(concurring specially)-

I concur in the opinion by Justice Porter.

A basic reason for holding the ordinance prohibitory is thát the county, having no authority to make police regulations for municipalities, by this ordinance refuses to consider any application on its merits, and refuses to fix any “conditions and terms” for an applicant to comply with, if the application comes from that area of the county where the board has authority to fix “conditions and terms.” By this I do not mean to say that the county commissioners may not reject an application coming from a municipality if the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. DiefendorfIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  2. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Ex Parte PfirrmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Ex parte MansfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. In re GaleIdaho Supreme Court · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API