Legal Opinion
Vander Groef v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 15, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
32 N.J. Super. 365 (1954)
108 A.2d 472
MICHAEL VANDER GROEF, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 11, 1954.
Decided October 15, 1954.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and SCHETTINO.
Mr. Harry Chashin argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Marcus & Levy, attorneys; Mr. Chashin and Mr. Hyman W. Rosenthal, of counsel and on the brief).
Mr. John J. Monigan, Jr., argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Horner, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hansen v. Eagle-Picher Lead Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Jones v. LahnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Schwartz v. Howard Savings InstitutionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- Crouse v. the Stacy-Trent Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Alcott v. Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Miller v. MuscarelleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Everett Melvin Roberts v. United States of America, and Union Carbide Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- Huszar v. Greate Bay HotelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- ELIZABETH C. DECARLO VS. AQUA BEACH RESORT, LLC (L-0428-14, CAPE MAY COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
- Martin v. Bengue, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957