Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burton v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 21, 1926Published

1DissentStacy, C. J.

R. Smith, ever had any right to remove this suit to the Federal Court for trial after judgment by default was entered against him, which may be doubted, I think he has clearly waived it on the facts of the present record.

In the first place, the right of the nonresident defendant to have the default judgment set aside comes froin C. S., 492, which provides that, where service is obtained by publication, the defendant may, upon good cause shown, be allowed to defend after judgment, or at any time within one year after notice thereof and within five years after its rendition, on such terms as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wabash Western Railway v. BrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Harter v. KernochanSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Howard v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Page v. . McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Gaster v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API