Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 18, 2001No. SC 83806PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONNIE L. WHITE, Judge.

Respondents, who include commissioners of the St. Louis Board of Police (“Board”) and St. Louis police officers, brought this action seeking a declaration that the State is required to defend them and to pay judgments against them in lawsuits where they are sued for actions taken in the course of their duties as officials or employees of the police board. The trial court declared that the Board is a state agency and that its members and the police officers it supervises are entitled to State Legal Expense Fund (“LEF”) coverage. 1 This Court granted transfer after…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of WerthsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  2. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. DesCampsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dorris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. Yvonne Thomas v. St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners Mary Nelson Michael J. Quinn Susan Rollins Bartholomew Saracino Francis G. Slay, MayorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  5. Scott v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API